Author(s):
Winnicki Ireneusz Andrzej
Professor
Office: Military University of Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geodesy
Address: 00-908, Poland, Warsawa, gen. Sylwestra Kaliskiego 2 Str

References:

[1] Winnicki I. FEM: linear advection and Hermite elements. Part I. Systems of the difference schemes. Computational Technologies. 2025; 30(4):119–132. DOI:10.25743/ICT.2025.30.4.011.

[2] Durran D.R. Numerical methods for wave equations in geophysical fluid dynamics. N.Y.: Springer; 1999: 466.

[3] Durran D.R. Numerical methods for fluid dynamics with applications to geophysics. N.Y.: Springer; 2010: 532.

[4] Samarskii A.A., Andreev V.B. Difference methods for elliptic equations. Moscow: Nauka; 1976: 352. (In Russ.)

[5] Winnicki I., Jasinski J. Finite element method in hermitian spaces in the analysis of irregular atmospheric processes. Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Interactive Information and Processing Systems for Meteorology, Oceanography and Hydrology. Long Beach: American Meteorology Society; 2000: 204–207.

[6] Rymarz C., Winnicki I. Confrontation of the spectral structure of the operators in the method of space-time finite elements and the method of finite difference. Bulletin of the Military University of Technology. 1978; (27):23–32. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332130490.16.

[7] Rymarz C., Winnicki I. A tentative multi-criterion appraisal of the numerical method based on the spline approximation. Bulletin of the Military University of Technology. 1980; (29):21–29. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332130467.

[8] Donea J., Quartapelle L., Selmin V. Ananalysis of time discretization in the finite element solution of hyperbolic problems. Journal of Computational Physics. 1987; 70(2):463–499. DOI:10.1016/0021-9991(87)90191-4.

[9] Strang G., Fix G. A Fourier analysis of the finite element variational method. CIME Summer Schools. 1971; (57):793–840.

[10] Strang G., Fix G. An analysis of the finite element method. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall Inc.; 1973: 328.

[11] Marchuk A.G., Agoshkov V.I. Introduction to projection-grid methods. Moscow: Nauka; 1981: 416. (In Russ.)

[12] Cullen M.J.P. The finite element method. Numerical methods used in atmospheric models. Vol. II. Geneva: GARP Publication Series; 1979; (17):302–339.

[13] Cullen M.J.P. The use of quadratic finite element methods and irregular grids in the solution of hyperbolic problem. Journal of Computational Physics. 1982; 45(2):221–245. DOI:10.1016/0021-9991(67)90053-8.

[14] Strang G., Fix G. An analysis of the finite element method. New edition. Philadelphia: Wellesley-Cambridge Press; 2008: 402.

[15] Birkhoff G., Schultz M., Varga R. Piecewise Hermite interpolation in one and two variables with applications to partial differential equations. Numerische Mathematik. 1968; (11):232–256. DOI:10.1007/BF02161845.

[16] Shokin Yu.I., Yanenko N.N. The method of differential approximation: application to gas dynamics. Novosibirsk: Nauka; 1985: 364. (In Russ.)

[17] Sengupta T.K., Suman V.K., Sengupta S., Sundaram P. Quantifying parameter ranges for high fidelity simulations for prescribed accuracy by Lax –Wendroff method. Computers & Fluids. 2023; 254(4). DOI:10.1016/j.compfluid.2023.105794. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/367316490_Quantifying_parameter_ranges_for_high_fidelity_simulations_for_prescribed_accuracy_by_Lax-Wendroff_method.

[18] Shokin Yu.I. The method of the first differential approximation in the theory of difference schemes for hyperbolic systems of equations. Trudy Matematicheskogo Instituta Imeni V.A. Steklova. 1973; (122):66–84. (In Russ.)

[19] Marchuk A.G. Numerical analysis for mathematical physics. Warsaw: PWN; 1983: 514. (In Polish.)

[20] MacCormack R.W. The effect of viscosity in hypervelocity impact cratering. Proceedings of the 4th Aerodynamic Testing Conference. Cincinnati: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics; 1969; 69–354. DOI:10.2514/6.1969-354.

[21] Winnicki I., Jasinski J., Pietrek S. New approach to the Lax –Wendroff modified differential equation for linear and non-linear advection. Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations. 2019; 35(6):2275–2304. DOI:10.1002/num.22412

[22] Shokin Yu.I., Winnicki I., Jasinski J., Pietrek S. High order modified differential equation of the Beam-Warming method. Part I: the dispersive features. Russian Journal of Numerical Analysis and Mathematical Modelling. 2020; 35(2):1–12. DOI:10.1515/rnam-2020-0007.

[23] Shokin Yu.I., Winnicki I., Jasinski J., Pietrek S. High order modified differential equation of the Beam-Warming method. Part II: the disspative features. Russian Journal of Numerical Analysis and Mathematical Modelling. 2020; 35(3):175–185. DOI:10.1515/rnam-2020-0014.

[24] LeVeque R.J. Finite difference methods for ordinary and partial differential equations. Steady-state and time-dependent problems. Philadelphia: SIAM; 2007: 341.

[25] Marchuk A.G., Chubarov L.B., Shokin Yu.I. Numerical modeling of tsunami waves. Novosibirsk: Nauka; 1983: 142. (In Russ.)

[26] Lax P.D., Wendroff B. Systems of conservation laws. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics. 1960; 9(2):217–237. DOI:10.1002/cpa.3160130205.

[27] Boris J.P., Book D.L. Flux-corrected transport. SHASTA. A fluid transport algorithm that works. Journal of Computational Physics. 1973; 11(1):38–69. DOI:10.1016/0021-9991(73)90147-2.

[28] Zalesak S.T. Fully multidimensional flux-corrected transport algorithms for fluids. Journal of Computational Physics. 1979; 31(3):335–362. DOI:10.1016/0021-9991(79)90051-2.

[29] Smolarkiewicz P.K. A simple positive definite advection scheme with small implicit diffusion. Monthly Weather Review. 1983; 111(3):479–486.

[30] Smolarkiewicz P.K. A fully multidimensional positive definite advection transport algorithm with small implicit diffusion. Journal of Computational Physics. 1984; 54(2):325–362. DOI:10.1016/0021-9991(84)90121-9.

[31] Sch¨ar C., Smolarkiewicz P.K. A synchronous and iterative flux-correction formalism for coupled transport equations. Journal of Computational Physics. 1996; 128(1):101–120. DOI:10.1006/jcph.1996.0198.

[32] Geidarov N., Zakharov Y., Shokin Yu.I. Solution of the problem of viscous fluid with a given pressure differential. Russian Journal of Numerical Analysis and Mathematical Modelling. 2011; 26(1). DOI:10.1515/rjnamm.2011.003.

[33] Larsson S., Thom´ee V. Partial differential equations with numerical methods. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2009: 272.

34] Shokin Yu.I., Sergeeva Yu.V., Khakimzyanov G.S. Construction of monotonic schemes by the differential approximation method. Russian Journal of Numerical Analysis and Mathematical Modelling. 2005; 20(5):463–481. DOI:10.1163/156939805775186659.

[35] Harten A., Osher S. Uniformly high-order accurate nonoscillatory schemes. I. Upwind and high-resolution schemes. Berlin: Springer; 1997: 588.

[36] Dupont T. Galerkin methods for first order hyperbolics: an example. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis. 1973; 10(5):890–899. DOI:10.1137/0710074.

[37] Sagaut P., Suman V.K., Sundaram P., Rajpoot M.K., Bhumkar Y.G., Sengupta S., Sengupta A., Sengupta T.K. Global spectral analysis: review of numerical
methods. Computers & Fluids. 2023; 261(4). DOI:10.1016/j.compfluid.2023.105915. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/370638927_Global_spectral_analysis_Review_of_numerical_methods.

[38] Lynch D.R. Numerical partial differential equations for environmental scientists and engineers. A first practical course. N.Y.: Springer; 2010: 388.

[39] LeVeque R.J. Finite volume methods for hyperbolic problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011: 558.

[40] Thomas L.H. Elliptic problems in linear differential equations over a network. Watson Science Computer Laboratory Report. N.Y.: Columbia University; 1949: 71.