Author(s):
Chuvaev Andrey Viktorovich
Position: Senior Fellow
Office: Russian Technological University
Address: 119454, Russia, Moscow, 78 Vernadsky Avenue
E-mail: achuv@yandex.ru

Baranov Alexey Andreevich
PhD.
Position: Leading research officer
Office: Institute of the Physics of the Earth
Address: 123242, Russia, Moscow, Bolshaya Gruzinskaya str., 10-1
E-mail: baranov@ifz.ru
SPIN-code: 3827-4224

Bobrov Aleksandr Marovich
PhD.
Position: Leading research officer
Office: Institute of the Physics of the Earth
Address: 123242, Russia, Moscow, Bolshaya Gruzinskaya str., 10-1
E-mail: a_m_bobrov@yahoo.com
SPIN-code: 5119-6894

References:

[1]. Trubitsyn V.P., Baranov A.A., Evseev A.N., Trubitsyn A.P. Exact Analytical Solutions of the Stokes Equation for Testing the Equations of Mantle Convection with a Variable Viscosity. Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth. 2006; 42(7):537–545.

[2]. Schubert G., Turcotte D.L., Olson P. Mantle Convection in the Earth and Planets. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press; 2001: 940.

[3]. Lobkovsky L., Kotelkin V. The history of supercontinents and oceans from the standpoint of thermochemical mantle convection. Precambrian Research. 2015; (259):262–277.

[4]. Phillips B.R., Bunge H.-P. Heterogeneity and time dependence in 3D spherical mantle convection models with continental drift. Earth Planetary Science Letters. 2005; 233(1-2):121–135.

[5]. Yoshida M., Santosh M. Mantle convection modeling of the supercontinent cycle: Introversion, extroversion, or a combination? Geoscience Frontiers. 2014; 5(1):77–81.

[6]. Bobrov A.M., Baranov A.A., Modeling of moving deformable continents by active tracers: closing and opening of oceans, recirculation of oceanic crust. Geodynamics and Tectonophysics. 2018; 9(1): 287–307.

[7]. Lobkovskii L.I., Inyukhin A.V., Kotelkin V.D. Subduction and cyclic processes in the upper mantle. Doklady Earth Sciences. 2014; 459(1):1348–1352.

[8]. Magni V., Faccenna C., van Hunen J., Funiciello F. Delamination vs. break-off: the fate of continental collision. Geophysical Research Letters. 2013; 40(2):285–289.

[9]. Samovarov O.I., Gaysaryan S.S. The web-laboratory architecture based on the cloud and the UniHUB implementation as an extension of the OpenStack platform. Trudy Instituta Sistemnogo Programmirovaniya RAN. 2012; (26):403–420. (In Russ.)

[10]. Sukhoroslov O.V. Integration of distributed computing applications and resources on the base of cloud platform. Program Systems: Theory and Applications. 2014; 5(4):171–182. (In Russ.)

[11]. Kudryavtsev A.O., Koshelev V.K., Izbyshev A.O., Dudina I.A., Kurmangaleev Sh. F., Avetisyan A.I., Ivannikov V.P., Velikhov V.E., Ryabinkin E.A. Development and implementation of a cloud system for solving high-performance tasks. Trudy Instituta Sistemnogo Programmirovaniya RAN. 2013; (24):403–420. (In Russ.)

[12]. Boukhanovsky A.V., Vasiliev V.N., Vinogradov V.N., Smirnov D.Yu., Sukhorukov S.A., Yapparov T.G. CLAVIRE: Perspective technology for second generation cloud computing. Journal of Instrument Engineering. 2011; (10):7–14. (In Russ.)

[13]. Aladyshev O.S., Baranov A.V., Ionin R.P., Kiselev E.A., Orlov V.A. Comparative analysis of variants of deployment of program platforms for high performance computing. Vestnik USATU. 2014; 18(3(64)):295–300. (In Russ.)

[14]. Baranov A.V., Nikolaev D.S. The use of container virtualization in the organization of high-performance computing. Program Systems: Theory and Applications. 2016; 7(1):117–134. (In Russ.)

[15]. Aleshin I.M., Kholodkov K.I. Using distributed computing systems for a posteriori distribution computation. Geophysical Research. 2014; 15(4):73–80. (In Russ.)

[16]. Mell P., Grance T. The NIST definition of cloud computing. Recommendations of the National Institute of Standards and Technology. Available at: https://csrc.nist.gov/publications/detail/sp/800-145/final (accessed 10.10.2019)

[17]. Shabanov B.M., Telegin P.N., Baranov A.V., Semenov D.V., Chuvaev A.V. Dynamic configurator of a virtual distributed computing environment. Software Journal: Theory and Applications. 2017; (4):1–9. (In Russ.)

[18]. The Definitive KVM (Kernel-based Virtual Machine) API Documentation. Available at: https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt (accessed 10.10.2019).

[19]. VMware API and SDK Documentation. Available at: https://www.vmware.com/support/pubs/sdk_pubs.html (accessed 10.10.2019).

[20]. Windows previous versions documentation. Available at: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/previous-versions/windows/desktop/virtual/windows-virtualization-portal?redirectedfrom=MSDN (accessed 10.10.2019).

[21]. Bobrov A.M., Baranov A.A. Thermochemical mantle convection with drifting deformable continents: Main features of supercontinent cycle. Pure and Applied Geophysics. 2019; 176(8):3545–3565.

[22]. Bobrov A.M., Baranov A.A. The mantle convection model with non-Newtonian rheology and phase transitions: The flow structure and stress fields. Fizika Zemli. 2016; 52(1):129–143.

[23]. Chervov V.V., Chernykh G.G., Bushenkova N.A., Kulakov I.Yu. Numerical modelling of 3D convection in the upper Earth mantle under lithosphere of Eurasia. Computational Technologies. 2014; 19(5):101–114. (In Russ.)

[24]. Chervov V.V., Chernykh G.G., Chervov A.V. Numerical modeling of convection under cratons of Central Asia. Computational Technologies. 2009; 14(5):114–121. (In Russ.)

[25]. Zhong S., Zuber M.T., Moresi L.N., Gurnis M. Role of temperature-dependent viscosity and surface plates in spherical shell models of mantle convection. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth Journal. 2000; 105(B5):11063–11082.

[26]. Moresi L.N., Gurnis M. Constraints on the lateral strength of slabs from three dimensional dynamic flow models. Earth Planetary Science Letters. 1996; 138(1-4):15–28.

[27]. Computational infrastructure for geodynamics. Available at: https://geodynamics.org/cig/software/citcoms/ (accessed 10.11.2019).

[28]. Becker T.W. On recent seismic tomography for the western United States. Geochem., Geophys.,Geosys. 2012; (13):Q01W10.

29. Paulson A., Zhong Sh., Wahr J. Modelling post-glacial rebound with lateral viscosity variations. Geophysical Journal International. 2005; (163):357–371.

[30]. Yoshida M. Temporal evolution of stress state in a supercontinent during mantle reorganization. Geophysical Journal International. 2010; 180(1):1–22.

[31]. Karato S., Wu P. Rheology of the upper mantle: a synthesis. Science. 1993; (260):771–778.

[32]. Hughes T.J.R. The finite element method: Linear static and dynamic finite element analysis. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs; 1987: 825.

[33]. Ramage A., Wathen A.J. Iterative solution techniques for the Stokes and Navier—Stokes equations. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids. 1994; 19(1):67–83.

[34]. Gobysh A.V., Shokina N.Y. Analysis of finite element and finite difference approximations for the numerical modelling of fluid flows. Computational Technologies. 2006; 11(6):22–30. (In Russ.)