Article information
2019 , Volume 24, ¹ 1, p.120-135
Chebrov D.V.
Processing center Petropavlovsk in seismic subsystem of Tsunami Warning System in Russian Far East in 2010-2018
The new Tsunami Warning System in Russian Far East was created in 2006-2010, and it is on duty for more than eight years. The TWS-2010 replaced the old TWS-1958 that had been developed in 1950s after the Great Kamchatka earthquake in 1952. The main method in TWS is still the seismic method, based on the magnitude-geographical criterion. Therefore, the seismic subsystem of TWS can be called a key component that affects the characteristics of entire system. In this paper the problem of real characteristics of seismic subsystem of TWS is examined. The main characteristics that affect the entire TWS efficiency are the system reaction time and coordinate estimates accuracy. A detailed analysis of these characteristics is carried out on the example of Kamchatka. This region was chosen because of the highest seismicity and rather good system of seismic observations. Empirical distributions of system reaction times and coordinate accuracy are considered. Parameters of these distributions describe the quality of TWS processing. The detailed analysis of spatial distribution of reaction times and coordinate estimates accuracy made it possible to reveal “good” and “bad” areas for TWS processing. It was found out, that seismic subsystem of TWS shows consistently high performance throughout the entire period of operation. Reaction times and coordinate estimates accuracy satisfy the regulation requirements of TWS. The detailed analysis for spatial distribution of reaction times and coordinate estimates accuracy made it possible to conclude that most part of the Kamchatka region is covered by accurate and rapid TWS estimates. In the same time, low performance regions were revealed. Reaction times and coordinate accuracy in these regions are near the limit values, according to regulations of TWS. These low performance areas include North Kuril and Aleutian trench area (east of the Commander islands). The main reason for the reduced quality of TWS processing of earthquakes occurring in these areas is the lack of seismic observations of the Kuril and Aleutian Islands.
[full text] [link to elibrary.ru]
Keywords: tsunami, earthquake, earthquake source, seismic station, seismic network, tsunami warning system
doi: 10.25743/ICT.2019.24.1.009
Author(s): Chebrov Danila Viktorovich PhD. Position: Director Office: Kamchatka Branch of Geophysical Survey of Russian Academy of Science Address: 683006, Russia, Petropavlovsk-Kamchatskii, Piip blvd, 9
Phone Office: (415) 2-43-18-01 E-mail: danila@emsd.ru SPIN-code: 2274-1970 References: [1]. Chebrov, V.N. Expansion of the system of the seismological observations for tsunami warning in Far East of Russia. Bulletin of KRAESC. Earth sciences. 2007; 9(1):27–36.
[2]. Savarensky, E.F. Problem of tsunami. Byuleten' Soveta po seysmologii AN SSSR. Sbornik statey po tsunami. 1956; (2):3–7. (In. Russ.)
[3]. Poplavskiy, A.A., Khramushin, V.N., Nepop, K.I., Korolev, Yu.P. Operativnyy prognoz tsunami na morskikh beregakh Dal'nego Vostoka Rossii [Operative prediction of tsunami on the sea coastline of Far East of Russia]. Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk: DVO RAN; 1997: 273. (In Russ.)
[4]. Chebrov, V.N., Gusev, A.A., Gusiakov, V.K., Mishatkin, V.N., Poplavsky, A.A. A concept of development of a system for seismological observations with the purpose of tsunami warning in the Far East of Russia. Seismic Instruments. 2009; 45(4):41–57.
[5]. Soloviev, S.L. The repeatability of earthquakes and tsunamis in Pacific ocean. Trudy SakhKNII. 1972; (29):7–47. (In. Russ.)
[6]. Gusiakov, V.K. Magnitude-geographical criterion for operational tsunami prognosis: analysis of application in 1958–2009. Seismic Instruments. 2010; 46(3):5–21.
[7]. Poplavskiy, A.A., Kulikov, E.A., Poplavskaya, L.N. Metody i algoritmy avtomatizirovannogo prognoza tsunami [Methods and algorithms of automatic prediction of tsunami]. Moscow: Nauka; 1988: 128. (In. Russ.)
[8]. Wächter, J., Babeyko, A., Fleischer, J., Häner, R., Hammitzsch, M., Kloth, A., Lendholt, M. Development of tsunami early warning systems and future challenges. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences.Nat. 2012; 12(6):1923–1935. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-1923-2012.
[9]. Chebrov, V.N., Droznin, D.V., Kugaenko, Yu.A., Levina, V.I., Senyukov, S.L., Sergeev, V.A., Shevchenko, Yu.V., Yashchuk, V.V. The system of detailed seismological observations in Kamchatka in 2011. Journal of Volcanology and Seismology. 2013; 7(1):16–36.
[10]. Chebrov, V.N., Droznin, D.V., Sergeev, V.A., Pantyukhin, E.A. System of acquisition, processing, storage and representation of seismological data and results of its processing in Seismic Subsystem of Tsunami Warning System. Hardware, algorithms and software. 50 years of seismological observations in Kamchatka, 1961–2011. Proceedings of III conference “Problems of complex geophysical monitoring of Far East of Russia”. Petropavlovsk-Kamchatskiy: KF GS RAN; 2011: 332–336. (In Russ.)
[11]. Droznin, D.V., Droznina, S.Ya. Program for seismic signal processing DIMAS. Seismic Instruments. 2010; 46(3):22–34.
[12]. Zemletryaseniya Severnoy Evrazii, 2011 god [Earthquakes of the Northern Eurasia, 2011]. Obninsk: FITs EGS RAN; 2017: 540. ISSN 1818–6254. (In Russ.)
[13]. Ototyuk, D.A. Chebrov, D.V., Vikulina, S.A. Results of proceedings of information in the processing center “Petropavlovsk” based on regulations of Tsunami Warning System and Urgent Seismic Messages service in 2012–2013. “Problems of complex geophysical monitoring of Far East of Russia”.Proceedings of IV science conference. Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky. Sep. 30 – Oct. 6, 2013. Obninsk: GS RAN; 2013: 279–282. (In Russ.)
[14]. Chebrov, D.V., Kugaenko, Yu.A., Lander, A.V., Abubakirov, I.R., Voropaev, P.V., Gusev, A.A., Droznin, D.V., Droznina, S.Ya., Ivanova, E.I., Kravchenko, N.M., Matveenko, E.A., Mityushkina, S.V., Ototyuk, D.A., Pavlov, V.M., Raevskaya, A.A., Saltykov, V.A., Senyukov, S.L., Skorkina, A.A., Serafimova, Yu.K. The March 29th, 2017 earthquake with KS = 15.0, MW = 6.6, I = 6 in Ozernoy gulf (Kamchatka). Bulletin of KRAESC. Earth sciences. 2017; 35(3):7–21.
[15]. Chebrov, V.N., Droznin, D.V., Zakharchenko, N.Z., Mishatkin, V.N., Sergeev, V.A., Sinitsyn, V.I., Shevchenko, Yu.V. Base seismic station «Petropavlovsk» for the tsunami warning survey. Seismic Instruments. 2010; 46(1):5–15.
[16]. Zayakin, Yu.Ya., Luchinina, A.A. Katalog tsunami na Kamchatke [Kamchatka tsunami catalogue]. Obninsk: RIHMI-WDC; 1987: 50. (In Russ.)
[17]. Pinegina, T.K., Kozhurin, A.I., Ponomareva, V.V. Seismic and tsunami hazard assessment for Ust-Kamchatsk settlement, Kamchatka, based on paleoseismological data. Bulletin of KRAESC. Earth sciences. 2012; 19(1):138–159.
[18]. Chebrov, D.V., Kugaenko, Yu.A., Abubakirov, I.R., Lander, A.V., Pavlov, V.M., Saltykov, V.A., Titkov, N.N. The July 17th, 2017 Near-Aleutian earthquake with Mw = 7.8 on the border of the Komandor seismic gap (western part of the Aleutian Arc). Bulletin of KRAESC. Earth sciences. 2017; 35(3):22–25.
[19]. Chebrov, V.N., Levin, Yu.N., Chebrov, D.V., Ototuk, D.A., Vikulina, S.A. The new generation seismic subsystem of tsunami warning system and processingof the great earthquake in the Japan of March 11, 2011, MW = 9.1. Science and technological developments. 2011; 90(1):13–26.
[20]. Chebrov, V.N. Sil'nye kamchatskie zemletryaseniya 2013 goda [Strong earthquakes in Kamchatka in 2013]. Petropavlovsk-Kamchatskiy: Kholdingovaya kompaniya «Novaya kniga»; 2014: 252. ISBN 978–5–87750–298–7. (In Russ.)
Bibliography link: Chebrov D.V. Processing center Petropavlovsk in seismic subsystem of Tsunami Warning System in Russian Far East in 2010-2018 // Computational technologies. 2019. V. 24. ¹ 1. P. 120-135
|